| October
22, 2004 On October
14th 2004, General Motors (GM) reported third quarter results. The Company
earned $440 million, or $0.78 per share, which compared to earnings of
$448 million or $0.79 per share last year. Sales were $44.9 billion, a
3.2% increase from 3Q 2003 sales of $43.5 billion. Worldwide production
increased by 54,000 vehicles to 1.95 million while GM’s global market
share increased from 15.1% to 15.5%.
GMAC, GM’s financing arm, continues to perform well. The division
reported net income of $656 million for the quarter up from $630 million
last year. The largest contribution came from its Mortgages division,
which increased 19% in the quarter to $302 million. We expect GMAC to
continue to post good results as interest rates remain at historically low
levels. GM’s automotive division on the other hand had disappointing
results. The division produced a loss of $130 million with Europe being
the largest detriment contributing a loss of $236 million. Management has
announced plans to address the problem in Europe by targeting $600 million
in costs savings annually by 2006. A part of the savings will come from a
reduction in its workforce by up to 12,000 over the next two years.
We continue to believe that GM shares offer an attractive investment.
Further, we feel that that much of the negativity surrounding the Company
is already discounted in the price. GM pays an annual dividend of $2 a
share, which represents an attractive yield of 5.2% and should provide
support for the stock on the downside. We feel the dividend is safe given
the Company’s payout history and strong operating cash flow. In addition,
GM shares trade at a 23% discount to its book value of $49.34. Finally,
although management has lowered its earnings guidance for the year to
between $6.00 and $6.50 per share, this still implies a reasonable price
to earnings ratio of around six.
January 21, 2005
On January 19th, 2005 General Motors (GM) reported results for its 2004
fourth quarter and fiscal year end. For the quarter, adjusted earnings
from continuing operations were $569 million or $1.01 per share, which was
down from $838 million, or $1.47 per share in the fourth quarter of 2003.
For the year earnings from continuing operations were $3.6 billion or
$6.40 per share compared to earnings of $3.2 billion, or $5.62 per share
last year. GMAC , GM’s financing unit, once gain provided most of the
earnings muscle in 2004 contributing $2.9 billion to the bottom line while
the automotive operations chipped in for $1.2 billion. GM retained the
title of global market leader pumping out 9.1 million units in 2004 while
its global market share remained relatively flat in 2004 at 14.5%, versus
14.6% in 2003.
On January 13th, 2005, management announced earnings guidance for 2005
of approximately $4 to $5 per share. Earnings are expected to be lower
than last year due to a slowdown in business at GMAC and higher health
care costs. The market reacted negatively to this news although we felt
this information was mostly “yesterday’s news”. In other words, we believe
a lot of the negativity surrounding GM shares is already reflected in its
discounted valuation. For instance, even if GM earns $4 per share next
year the stock today would still sell for less than ten times earnings. In
addition, GM’s stock trades at a 27% discount to its current book value of
$50.63 per share. GM’s annual dividend of $2, which represents a yield of
5.4%, is also an attractive feature of this security. We feel the dividend
is safe given the company’s strong operating cash flow and that there are
no pension or heath care plan contributions planned for some time.
Despite the pessimism surrounding GM at the moment, we are optimistic
about a number of initiatives that we feel could get GM’s wheels back on
the road. First of all, GM plans to undergo a major restructuring at its
European division. It expects to take out an estimated $600 million in
annual costs by 2006, which includes reducing its workforce by 12,000 over
the next two years. Second, GM continues to aggressively pursue its growth
strategy in Asia, particularly China, which is the world’s fastest growing
vehicle market. GM plans to invest over $3 billion in China over the next
three years in a number of new projects including the introduction of new
vehicles, the creation of new facilities, the expansion of GM's existing
manufacturing joint ventures, and the launch of a new financing joint
venture. Finally, GM continues to work towards funding its pension and
health care liabilities. It contributed $4 billion to the plan in 2004 and
as of December 2004, its U.S. hourly and salaried pension plans were $3
billion over-funded.
While we agree that GM faces numerous challenges we contend that given
the stock market’s low valuation of its shares and the potential for
investor sentiment to turn more positive if GM makes good on its promises,
investors who are patient and think long term will eventually be rewarded.
March 24, 2005 On March 16th,
2005 General Motors Corp. (GM) said that is was revising its first quarter
and calendar year earnings guidance to reflect lower North American sales
and production volumes, a tougher pricing environment, and a more
car-based sales mix. GM said it now expects to report a loss of
approximately $1.50 per share in the first quarter compared to a previous
target of breakeven or better. For the calendar year, GM said it expects
to report earnings of approximately $1.00 to $2.00 per share.
Given that GM is one of the thirty stocks that make up the closely
followed Dow Jones Industrial Average; it tends to get more than its fair
share of media attention – particularly when the news is bad. While we
agree that GM is facing its share of problems at the moment, we think its
low share price justifies our commitment to the stock. In fact, we feel
that with the shares now trading below $30 a share, GM shares are trading
below its “sum of the parts” value.
Unlike GM’s automotive business, GM’s financing arm, General Motors
Acceptance Corp. (GMAC), continues to perform very well. GMAC operates
three distinct divisions: Financing, Mortgages and Insurance. In 2004 GMAC
had net income of over $2.9 billion and contributed most of GM’s
consolidated earnings. We feel on a standalone basis, GMAC could be worth
close to $15 billion or $28 per GM share. Looking at it another way, at
today’s current price, we think investors who purchase GM’s stock are
essentially paying for GMAC and getting the automotive business for
virtually nothing.
In the past, many investors have been drawn to GM because of its
dividend. The shares currently pay an annual dividend of $2, which at
today’s price represents a yield of close to 7%. However, with GM recently
cutting its earnings guidance to a range that is below its dividend, some
fear the company may be forced to cut or even eliminate the dividend
entirely. We caution that GM’s dividend should not be viewed as a sure
bet. Our view however, is that GM will continue to pay it unless
automobile sales trends substantially worse or the company suffers some
unforeseen negative event. It should be noted that GM has paid the $2 per
annum dividend rate since 1997 and they will probably make all efforts to
continue to pay this amount. As a further point, keep in mind that our
investment thesis with regards to GM is not dividend driven although it
does act as a sweetener while we wait. The primary reason we own GM is
that the stock trades below its book value of $40.10 and what we believe
to be its net asset value, break up value, etc.
On a final note, we were pleased to read that on March 21, 2005, GM
CEO, Rick Wagoner personally purchased 50,000 shares of GM for his own
investment account. In a related statement Mr. Wagoner explained that the
investment demonstrates his confidence in the long-term prospects of
General Motors.
May 6, 2005 These past few months have
been volatile for General Motors’ shareholders and this week was no
exception. Before the stock market opened on Wednesday, May 4th 2005, a
company called Tracinda announced that it was making a cash tender offer
for up to 28 million shares of GM at a price of $31 per share. Tracinda,
which already owns 22 million shares or 3.9%, is the private holding
company of Kirk Kerkorian, a well-known value investor. Mr Kerkorian, who
is 87 years old, is probably best remembered for his attempted takeover of
fellow carmaker Chrysler in 1995.
While Kirkorian insists that his purchase of GM is for investment
purposes only, many speculate that he may pressure management to unlock
the hidden value in the company’s financing arm; General Motors Acceptance
Corp (GMAC). One prominent Wall Street brokerage firm recently estimated
that GMAC’s mortgage and insurance operations alone could be worth between
$10 billion and $15 billion or between $18 and $27 per GM share.
The following day, May 6th 2005, Standard and Poors (S&P) announced
that it was downgrading GM’s bonds to junk status. S&P said the downgrade
partially reflected declining sales of GM’s Sport Utility Vehicles, which
have been impacted by the rising price of gasoline as well as competition
from other automakers. We think this announcement was widely anticipated
in advance by most investors. In fact, GM bonds had already fallen in
price to a level where its yield was comparable to other junk bonds. And
on a positive note, S&P did remark that GM should have no difficulty
accommodating “near-term cash requirements” and that GM’s financing arm
GMAC still likely has “sufficient funding flexibility” to support GM.
Despite all the news on GM this week, our investment thesis is
unchanged. We believe that GM shares have already priced in much of the
recent bad news and are fundamentally inexpensive at their current price.
GM currently trades at a 31% discount to its $45.27 book value and pays a
$2 per share annual dividend. The dividend represents a yield of over 6%
and while it should not be viewed as a sure thing, we feel GM has adequate
liquidly and will make all efforts necessary to pay it in the near future.
In the meantime, while we agree that GM faces numerous challenges, we
think that investors who are patient and think long term will eventually
be rewarded.
October 21, 2005 On October 16th, 2005 General Motors (GM)
announced third quarter results. The company reported a loss of $1.1
billion, or $1.92 per diluted share, excluding special items. These
results compare with net income of $315 million, or $0.56 per share, in
the third quarter of 2004. Results were adversely affected by lower
production volumes, continued increases in health care costs, higher
material costs, and a shift in vehicle mix away from full-sized sport
utility vehicles. Although GM’s earnings were disappointing, shares of GM
traded higher on the day. The reason for this is two-fold. First of all,
GM announced that it has reached a tentative agreement with its union, the
United Auto Workers (UAW). The agreement is projected to reduce GM’s
retiree health-care liabilities by about $15 billion, or 25% of the
company’s hourly health care liability. This is expected to translate into
an annual savings for GM of about $3 billion a year before taxes. Second,
the company announced that it is exploring the possible sale of a
controlling interest in General Motors Acceptance Corp (GMAC) to a
strategic partner. The goal is to restore GMAC’s investment grade credit
rating and renew its access to low-cost financing. Some analysts estimate
that GMAC could be worth as much as $15 billion or over $25 per GM share.
With GM shares now trading around $28, investors who purchase the shares
today are essentially paying for GMAC, GM’s financing arm, and getting the
automotive division for free.
January 27, 2006 On January 26th, 2006 General Motors (GM) reported
fourth quarter and full year financial results for 2005. For the quarter,
GM reported a loss of $1.2 billion or $2.09 per share excluding special
items. These results compare with adjusted earnings of $726 million, or
$1.28 per share in the year ago period. For the calendar year, GM reported
a loss, excluding special items, of $3.4 billion or $5.99 per share
compared with net income of $3.6 billion or $6.37 per share in 2004. By
contrast, GM’s financing arm, General Motors Acceptance Corp. (GMAC)
reported earnings of $1.1 billion in 2005, down from $1.5 billion in 2004.
It should be noted that GM is still actively looking to sell a majority
stake in GMAC to a strategic buyer. According to recent reports, GMAC
could be worth between $10 and $15 billion. This is interesting given that
the entire market capitalization for GM is currently only $12.8 billion.
While few would argue that last year was difficult for GM, it should be
noted that GM’s current problems are not an isolated case within the auto
industry. For example, Ford Motor Co. has also experienced large financial
losses in its North America division and many companies that supply
automobile parts to GM and Ford have also experienced their fair share of
turmoil. On a positive note, we were pleased to see that Kirk Kerkorian
recently increased his stake in GM to 9.9%. On January 10th, Kerkorian
aide Jerome York delivered a speech where he called upon GM management to
accelerate its turnaround plans. As part of this turnaround, York
recommended that GM should cut its annual dividend in half. This would
save the company more than $566 million per annum. It would also act as a
sign of good faith towards the union indicating that GM is willing to
share in the pain. York also suggested that GM should take efforts to
reduce the number of brand models that it currently offers. Although this
would result in a smaller market share for GM, it would allow management
to focus on its more profitable divisions to ultimately achieve an
improved bottom line.
February 10, 2006 On February 6th 2006, GM’s board of directors met
to discuss the company’s dividend policy, board composition, and the
progress of its turnaround efforts. What emerged from this meeting was a
decision by the board to reduce GM’s dividend by 50%, cut salaried worker
benefits and executive pay and replace an existing board member.
GM will reduce its annual dividend from $2 to $1 per share. We think
this was a prudent decision by the board. Not only will it save the
company approximately $566 million per year, but it removes a certain
psychological overhang on the stock, since a dividend cut has been
anticipated for some time. In addition to halving its dividend, GM
announced that it will freeze salaried retiree health benefits at 2006
levels starting in 2007. This will affect around 100,000 white collared
retirees and about 25,000 active employees. GM will also reduce executive
level salaries. For example, CEO Richard Wagoner will reduce his annual
salary by 50% or $1.1 million.
When combined, the dividend, salary and benefit reductions could save
GM close to $1 billion a year. But more importantly, these actions send a
message to GM’s union that all GM stakeholders must be willing to share in
the pain. A large proponent of this “equity of sacrifice” solution is Kirk
Kerkorian’s point man Jerome York. A veteran of large scale restructurings
at companies such as Chrysler and IBM, York earlier this week was asked to
join GM’s board of directors. Mr. York, with his credentials and the
backing of Mr. Kerkorian's 9.9% position, will likely become a central
figure in GM's boardroom. In addition, Mr. York’s presence should keep the
pressure on GM’s board to take faster action to reverse last year’s loss.
York will likely continue to push GM to reduce the number of brand models
it markets. Although selling fewer cars would result in lower sales and
lower market share, York argues that it would ultimately result in higher
profits for GM.
July 28, 2006 On Wednesday July 26th, General Motors (GM) reported
significantly improved 2006 second quarter financial results. Global
automotive operations were profitable on an adjusted basis, excluding
special items, for the first time since 2004, and the company posted a
second consecutive quarter of record revenue. Excluding an after tax
charge of $3.7 billion related to the previously announced attrition
program, GM earned $2.03 per share. Revenue increased 12% to $54.4 billion
as GM benefited from an increase in revenue per vehicle sold from $19,348
to $19,852. In addition, GM showed significant improvements again in both
Europe and Asia. GMAC, GM’s financing unit, had another strong quarter with
net income of $898 million up $82 million from the second quarter of 2005.
Although one good quarter does not make a trend, GM’s results are
encouraging. In the words of GM’s CEO Rich Wagoner “It's rewarding to see
our automotive business return to profitability on an operating basis and
a clear sign that we're on the right track, but there is more work to be
done." Investors have clearly taken notice of GM’s progress. So far this
year, shares of the automaker are up over 70% and could have further to
go. Wall Street analysts now expect GM to earn between $4 and $5 per share
in 2007. With the stock now trading at $32, GM trades at a forward price
to earnings multiple of just seven or eight times: below its historical
average.
Finally, it should also be noted that GM’s turnaround is still under
way and could produce further positive results. Billionaire investor Kirk
Kerkorian, who owns 9.9% of GM shares, continues to pressure GM to be more
aggressive in its restructuring efforts. For example, last month he sent
an open letter to GM’s board of directors urging them to explore the
possibility of an alliance with foreign automakers Nissan and Renault. In
his letter Mr. Kerkorian urged GM to "immediately and fully explore this
opportunity together with management" as it could help GM "realize
substantial synergies and cost savings and thereby greatly benefit the
company and enhance shareholder value."
June 29, 2007 Despite current volatility in the stock market,
shares of General Motors (GM) are performing relatively well. At the time
of this writing, GM is trading at a two year high of $38.50. In the last
two weeks the shares are up over 28%, and since its January 2006 low of
$18.61, shares of GM have more than doubled.
Much of the current enthusiasm surrounding GM pertains to its upcoming
contract negotiations with the United Autoworkers (UAW) union. Last week,
a tentative agreement was reached between the UAW and auto parts maker
Delphi. As part of the agreement, Delphi workers have agreed to reduce
their hourly wage from $27 per hour to $18.50, a decline of over 31%. The
importance of this agreement should not be underestimated in that reality
has set in. Clearly the autoworkers have recognized the extreme fragility
of their jobs, and lack of competitive advantage of North American
automakers. We believe that this new contract, as painful as it was for
Delphi workers to accept, will set a new positive tone for the industry
and will be an important ingredient to nursing North American automakers
back to health and stability. Although talks with GM aren’t expected to
begin until September, many now believe that a major hurdle has been
removed, and an equally constructive agreement could be in the works.
However, even if a competitive contract is not reached, we believe
there is limited downside to the stock. At its current price, GM is still
relatively inexpensive. For example, it currently trades at just 4 times
next year’s cash flow and at just 10 times earnings. In addition, GM
continues to pay an annual dividend of $1 per share which represents a
yield of around 2.8%. We think this yield is attractive to investors given
that treasury rates are still at historically low levels.
On the other hand, a positive outcome to the contract negotiation could
be a significant driver for GM shares. Admittedly, there are many
challenges which lay ahead for GM. However, we are becoming increasingly
confident that the company has weathered the worst of the storm and is now
headed in the right direction. The first step is negotiating lower wage
and benefit concessions with the UAW. If it can successfully execute this
crucial task, shares of GM should continue to move higher.
October 19, 2007 In the early hours of September 27th, General
Motors and the United Workers Auto Union (UAW) announced that they had
reached a tentative agreement on a new national labour contract. Although
the deal was officially ratified on October 11th, it wasn’t until early
this week that details of the contract were made available. On October
15th, GM’s executive team held a conference call with investors to go over
the more salient points, as well as the future financial implications of
the arrangement.
Under the terms of the agreement, GM will transfer its Voluntary
Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) obligation to a UAW-managed retiree
health care trust. To finance the plan, GM will contribute $16 billion of
existing plan assets, $11 billion in cash and a 6.5% $4.4 billion bond
that is convertible at $48 per GM share. This is very positive for GM as
the cash consideration represents just 67% of the $47 billion liability on
GM’s books. In addition, management believes by shifting responsibility
for the plan to the UAW, it can expect to save between $2.6 and $3.4
billion per year by 2010.
The agreement also establishes a two-tier wage system in which the UAW
will allow GM to expand its definition of non-production workers.
Effectively, GM can now offer buyout packages to older tier-one workers
and replace them with lower paid tier-two workers. The new tier-two hourly
rate works out to about $25/hr which is significantly below the current
tier-one rate of $73/hour. GM believes it can replace approximately 56,000
or 75% of its current UAW workers over the next four years. Although
management would not commit to a figure, it has been estimated that
savings could reach an additional $1 billion per year.
According to analyst estimates, GM should earn close to $4 a share this
year. Although its shares have recently appreciated to around $40 a share,
they are still not expensive at 10 times earnings. In addition, its $1
annual dividend continues to provide investors with a respectable yield of
2.5%. Factoring in the savings from the healthcare trust and buyouts, some
have estimated that GM could earn an additional $4-5 per share by 2010.
Admittedly, these are forward looking estimates and it could take some
time before all these factors are fully reflected in GM’s results.
|